Scoring Criteria - For Scorers
Regional Team Problem Bridge Strength Problem
The following are suggestions of what to look for when scoring student papers. Each part of the scoring rubic given to the students has been expanded to include suggestions of what you might look for in each category. This is to be used as a guide and is not necessarily all inclusive
The student will use mathematics to define and solve the problem
To meet this standard, the student will:
__________ Construct a solution
Part a) If w is the width of planks, t is thickness, d is distance between supports, and S is the weight bearing strength, the equation is
S = wt^2/2d
Part b) Weight bearing capability varies directly with the width of the plank or
As the width increases, the weight bearing capability increases or
May be represented graphically, a line with positive slope
Weight bearing capability varies directly with the square of the thickness of the plank or
As the thickness increases, the weight bearing capability increases greatly or
May be represented graphically, a parabola with vertex at zero, opening up, using only non-negative domain values
Weight bearing capability varies indirectly with the distance between the supports or
As distance between supports increases, weight bearing capability decreases or
May be represented graphically, a line with negative slope
The variation constant is 0.5 or 1/2
(More than one set of data should be used to determine the variation constant)
__________ Formulate questions and define the problem as related to conjecture or recommendation for the bridge construction
Part c) Some of the ideas that students might question or use in defining the problem are:
The student will use mathematical reasoning
To meet this standard, the student will:
__________ Predict results and make inferences
Some conjectures might be
support distance
minimizing support distance will minimize width and/or thickness of lumber
minimizing support distance may not always minimize cost
__________ Draw conclusions and verify results
must have mathematical or reasonable arguements to support for any of the conjectures that they make about the optimum construction of the bridge
Should show several (at least three) data sets to verify the equation that they developed
Discovery any extreaneous data sets --- the data of distance between supports = 1, width of plank = 50, thickness of plank = 5 and weight bearing capability = 125 does not fit the equation
The student will communicate knowledge and understanding in both everyday and mathematical language
To meet this standard, the student will:
In this section you are looking for effectively ways that sutdents use to communicate their problem solving and reasoning as outlined above.
__________ Organize and interpret information
clearly organized and neatly written charts of subsets of the complete data sets
neatly drawn and clearly labeled graphs of each of the relations
describe any conjectures in an organized and clear manner
__________ Represent and share information
the overall organization of how they presented their method of sovling the problems is effective
how they define the variables and write their equation
the best would be to represent all variable relationships in one equation and determine one variation constant
uses the words,such as varies directly, varies inversely , varies directly with the square when describing the relationships between the variables
could use graphs to represent the relationships discovered
| Total points | ÷ 6 = |
Score |
=> |
Rating |
Each category will receive a score of 4, 3, 2, 1, or 0 based on the following table:
4 - meets or exceeds all relvant criteria
3 - meets most relevant criteria
2 - meets some relevant criteria
1 - meets few relevant criteria
0 - not scoreable: off topic, no attempt, can't read, etc.